Mr Mark Oaten (Winchester): To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, if he will take steps to ensure the Child Support Agency (CSA) takes into account previous voluntary payments to former partners in excess of CSA awards when assessing future awards.
Surely the CSA has a customer service helpline for that kind of enquiry?
Mr Phil Willis (Harrogate & Knaresborough): To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills, if she will take steps to deny Jodie Marsh access to schools for which her Department is responsible.
Rebecca Loos I could understand, but what has Jodie Marsh done to piss off Phil Willis? I can think of one or two LibDem MPs more deserving of outright exclusion from contact with children… Has popular culture passed me by?… Has Jodie Marsh done something really bad?…
recessmonkey@gmail.com
editor[at]recessmonkey.com
Loading ...
http://bigbrother.digitalspy.co.uk/article/ds8979.html
hugo said this on March 23rd, 2006 at 2:30 am
The Oaten question is nasty and childish but also wrong - the IoS diary piece he did made clear he is back with his wife and kids. So leave them be.
Great job implying gays are paedophiles again!
anon said this on March 23rd, 2006 at 3:44 am
Where did that come from?
I was actually suggesting that Ming ought to be kept away from schools in case he scares the smaller children…
…or worse, tells them jokes.
Recess Monkey
Recess Monkey said this on March 23rd, 2006 at 4:37 am
…and when was Jodie Marsh accused of being a paedophile?
…and the Independent on Sunday Diary hardly counts as comprehensive dissemination of hard fact.
grrr.
Recess Monkey
Recess Monkey said this on March 23rd, 2006 at 4:39 am
Well, it is when Oaten wrote it himself.
Forgive me, but you do have poor track record on gay/paedo differentiating.
Too much time with “Guido” perhaps…
anon said this on March 23rd, 2006 at 5:18 am
Hang on a moment, didn’t you say Oaten was heterosexual again?
Where are the gay or paedo references in this story?
Recess Monkey said this on March 23rd, 2006 at 6:08 am
No, I said he was back with his wife and kids - so questions about child support are probably for a constituent rather than himself.
And I must have wrongly assumed you were associating (”distantly related”) Oaten with a question about being kept away from children because he is gay (in some way, at some time) and they are paedophiles (see Recess/Guido passim)
Sorry for confusing your past prejudices with your current ones.
anon said this on March 23rd, 2006 at 6:26 am
Everyone knows that children have weak immune systems, so surely having some lib dems near them would not be good for their health. Also, with the pressures on parents today, you might consider certain MPs enamoured with football kits to be a real strain on said parents finances.
Barry Allen said this on March 23rd, 2006 at 7:11 am
There is the whole issue of the LibDem policy to force all 16 year olds to take part in porn films - a sort of citizenship ceremony/national service arrangement for teenagers. A “cumming of age” ritual?
I think we should spend more time debating why LibDems shouldn’t be allowed near schools.
Recess Monkey said this on March 23rd, 2006 at 8:20 am
After the mess that you lot have made of them, I’d think it’d be more productive to keep Labour away from the schools!
Yellow Baboon said this on March 23rd, 2006 at 9:47 pm
Cutting riposte Yellow Baboon
let me just rush off and lick my semantic wounds.
Recess Monkey
Recess Monkey said this on March 23rd, 2006 at 10:43 pm
Would you phone the helpline when people know all about your extra-Parliamentary activities? Safer just questioning the minister.
Paresley said this on March 24th, 2006 at 2:29 am
This is a particularly nasty comment from the Monkey. The piece reads so clearly as gay/paedo.
Peregrine said this on March 24th, 2006 at 4:21 am
So Recess Monkey…
Nice to see that this story ended up in the Times.
Hope you were paid!
PBS2 said this on March 24th, 2006 at 4:41 am
Not been paid for the piece I’m afraid, it doesn’t really work like that.
You can read the piece however you like. I happen to think you’re taking this rather to seriously, a manner in which this website is not designed to be read.
Recess Monkey said this on March 24th, 2006 at 5:40 am
For those scratching their head as to what Phil Willis’ problem is
http://breakingnews.iol.ie/entertainment/story.asp?j=177017498&p=y77xy8zx4
John Smith said this on March 25th, 2006 at 4:12 am