21 Responses to “Holy crap! Recess Monkey gagged by Screws!”

1. If I were you I would check that the terms of the injunction don’t also cover disclosure of Mahmood’s real name (see the Galloway letter to MPs.)

   Paul Linford said this on April 5th, 2006 at 1:11 pm

2. Do they really have someone called Jonathan CRUSHER working at a posh firm like that? You want to be careful Monkey old mate - they might send him round for a ‘visit’

   Mike Ion said this on April 5th, 2006 at 1:21 pm

3. I assume that they will produce a copy of the order which you can put on the site? Did they have to explain to the court why they wanted this order?

   Jeremy said this on April 5th, 2006 at 1:42 pm

4. I love the fact that one of her colleagues is called CRUSHER!!!! Take the photo off the site, or we’ll send CRUSHER round!!!!

   The Silver Arrow said this on April 5th, 2006 at 1:47 pm

5. The picture is easily accessable using a google search.

   Barry Allen said this on April 5th, 2006 at 2:08 pm

6. On what grounds have they persuaded a Judge to issue a Court Order preventing publication of this tosser’s picture?
   Please post the actual letter, Recess. I gotta to know!
   I just can’t get my head round this.

   Richard Bailey said this on April 5th, 2006 at 2:08 pm

7. Lawyers are SO lame.

   dynamite said this on April 5th, 2006 at 2:14 pm

8. Fair comment in the public interest.

   Stand up for yourself. Are you a trembling mouse or proud primate?

   welshspin said this on April 5th, 2006 at 2:16 pm

9. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mazher_Mahmood

   Scroll down to the bottom. Sure as hell surprised me to see it there.

   JavaScript Monkey said this on April 5th, 2006 at 2:26 pm

10. Information wants to be free!

    Click Me said this on April 5th, 2006 at 2:38 pm

11. Pervez Khan (aka Mazher Mahmood, aka The Fake Sheik)Guido published an image of the notorious ‘Fake Sheik’ last Thursday. Recess Monkey also published the image, but has now removed it following a gagging order from News of the World. There’s a very good question here: On what grounds…

    Bloggerheads said this on April 5th, 2006 at 2:41 pm

12. his photo is on wikipedia!

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahzer_Mahmood

    I see it didnt take long for the Monkey incident to be metnioned in there

    J said this on April 5th, 2006 at 3:01 pm

13. There’s a copy of the court order on this chap’s blog -http://www.septicisle.info/2006/04/obsolete-ordered-to-remove-photo-of.html

    Anthony said this on April 5th, 2006 at 3:28 pm

14. It’s after 16.00. Shouldn’t a copy of that photo be going back up around now?

    Ripefig said this on April 5th, 2006 at 4:05 pm

15. It’s after 16.00. Shouldn’t a copy of that photo be going back up around now?

    Ripefig said this on April 5th, 2006 at 4:05 pm

16. They hit me too, although I didn’t get an email asking me to tell them where I got the image from.

    http://www.septicisle.info/2006/04/obsolete-ordered-to-remove-photo-of.html

    . said this on April 5th, 2006 at 4:09 pm

17. It’s after 4pm

    Lets have that photo again

    Andrew Young said this on April 5th, 2006 at 4:31 pm

18. The injunction has been extended to 5pm while the case is being heard.

    Beau Bo D Or said this on April 5th, 2006 at 4:33 pm

19. The injuction has been extended to 5pm though (http://media.guardian.co.uk/)

    Dominic Self said this on April 5th, 2006 at 4:35 pm

20. Call me pedantic, but what sort of lawyer doesn’t know that a written question ends with a question mark?

    TC said this on April 5th, 2006 at 5:14 pm

21. Just to ask again but:
    “On what grounds have they persuaded a Judge to issue a Court Order preventing publication of this tosser’s picture?”
    I admit my knowledge of this area is law is limited, but still, no authority immediately springs to mind under which this order could be issued (except maybe breach of copyright?)

    Gavin Whenman said this on April 5th, 2006 at 5:18 pm