RecessMonkey

Taking the nanny state too far



Recess Monkey has spent much of today scrutinising the Chancellor’s Pre-Budget Report, only to find that the puritanical Scot wants to organise our lives in far more detail than we had previously thought.

The Labour Party is using the banner below to promote the PBR message and it’s the second 5th December point that causes concern.

In what sense do you mean cleaner?

What form will this “Action to promote cleaner fuck” take? Occasionally I like a dirty fuck - will there be tax disincentives? Will clean fucking earn me tax credits? What is the tax regime for a dirty fuck if I clean up afterwards?

I’m sure I can trust my readers to take this debate forwards in a mature and constructive manner.

Recess Monkey
recessmonkey@gmail.com


editor[at]recessmonkey.com



MessageSpace Advertising

Tagged With: , ,

6 Responses to “Taking the nanny state too far”

  1. um.

    Fuck off?

    sorry.

  2. Not very new approach on propaganda..

  3. the thought of you fucking dirty or not, in your human or simian form, is repugnant. any you follow up with a photo of the only gay in the village. you one sick thing

  4. I’ve left my reading glasses in the glove compartment of my Reliant Robin, but does point 3 really say: “£200 Winter Fuck Payment guaranteed”. Presumably another means-tested benefit for bloody octogenarians.

  5. Do my eyes deceive me as well? But are the Tories still committed to “cu*nts”?

  6. I must apologise for my last comment. I appear to have mistakenly put an asterisk in it!
    Great site are you going to let on which MP you service? BTW do you have any anecdotes on BFG? Or as he is known locally Barry Fucking Gardiner. If you do pls send by email only.

Leave a Reply