Can I throw my caveat in first. I don’t have any problems with Joe Murphy, who in my experience is a respectable and professional journalist. In fact, of Joe’s team, only his deputy offends me.
Paul Waugh, a man I don’t know personally, left the Independent after reporting an off-the-record conversation with Number 10 press officer Tom Kelly, in which the late Dr Kelly was described as a “Walter Mitty” character. I’m willing to concede that maybe this was reasonable betrayal of trust, given the public interest, but yesterday he did much worse.
Yesterday’s Evening Standard ran a Waugh story on its front page about how Tony Blair’s personal life nearly led him to resign earlier in the year. Although the story was on the back of a roundabout comment by Lord Bragg, pretty much every journalist in the lobby has known the details for months now and they are unambiguously personal. There is some debate as to whether the Sun or the BBC first got the story; but what is clear is that the media industry at the time felt it would be dishonourable - and not in the public interest - to run the story.
John Humphrys on this morning’s Today Programme refused to go into Blair’s personal life, even though the Standard yesterday published everything around the story but the story itself. Waugh should take a step back and think to himself why honourable journalists don’t publish certain things and what that says about his character. Or maybe he was off sick the day they taught ethics at journalism school.
Waugh isn’t the only source of my ire, Amanda Platell has an unerring ability to get on my nerves. Yesterday, she wrote a short piece entitled, “You can take the Beckham out of Essex…”. Well I’m from Essex and I don’t appreciate snotty whingers like Platell making snyde inferences about people from a place she obviously doesn’t know. I’m also no great football follower but even I recognise there are significantly more people in Britain who consider David Beckham to be a national hero than think of Amanda Platell in the same terms - even though he’s from Essex.
Another thing pissing me off is the change in the paper’s line on Crossrail. It’s a £10bn rail project that will help bring regeneration to some of the poorest areas in London and the South East. The Evening Standard’s City Diary yesterday was talking down the chances of raising the money required to build the scheme, even though they know the line will pay for itself eventually. For heaven’s sake, we’re spending twice as much on the Eurofighter that won’t do anything for deprivation in London.
Yesterday’s final transgression was the diary piece below:
Copyright 2004 Associated Newspapers Ltd.
The Evening Standard (London) September 14, 2004
Leaking is latest disaster to strike Portcullis House
Politicians are often accused of leaking; now Portcullis House in Westminster has become the mother of all leaks. The £240 million extension to the Houses of Parliament, designed by Sir Michael Hopkins and opened only four years ago, has a major problem with its roof. Despite its vast cost - £13.2 million - it has begun leaking like a sieve. The constant dripping from the eaves has been the cause of consternation to regulars in the Portcullis House, which provides offices for 200 MPs and their staff. “As I took a tour of this fine building this morning, I saw what at first sight appeared to be an art installation on the fifth floor,” one of their number muses. “I was rapidly disabused of this notion when I saw rain dripping through the roof into the ‘installation’, which consisted of three red buckets.” All this follows a catalogue of disasters for the building. Aside from the controversy over the £150,000 spent on fig trees from Florida for the premises, there have been rodent infestations, the restaurants have failed a health check, a hawk took roost in the building and MPs have been complaining about the sweltering heat during the summer. The Office of the Clerk of the Houses of Parliament have swung into action already. “The Courtyard roof was leaking,” says a spokesman. “We are already in discussions with the contractors.
If this looks familiar, it’s because you read it here http://bill.verity-networks.com/ext/recess/index.php/2004/09/13/how_much_did_this_building_cost_anyway
Other papers, when they’re pinching my material, have the courtesy to get in touch first and let me know. But not the Standard, which has grown fat and decadent on its monopoly. If you’re fed up with the Evening Standard, perhaps it’s time to contact the Competition Commission about breaking up this monopoly once and for all. http://www.competition-commission.org.uk
Rant over
Recess Monkey
Addendum
Having contacted the Competition Commission, I have discovered that reviews of markets are instigated by the Office of Fair Trading. enquiries@oft.gsi.gov.uk
Recess Monkey